Premium
Interlaminar shear properties of graphite fiber, high‐performance resin composites
Author(s) -
Varma D. S.,
Needles H. L.,
Kourtides D. A.,
Fish R. H.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
polymer composites
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.577
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1548-0569
pISSN - 0272-8397
DOI - 10.1002/pc.750040204
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , epoxy , wetting , composite number , shear (geology) , graphite , shear strength (soil) , polyimide , environmental science , layer (electronics) , soil science , soil water
Shear properties of laminates consisting of graphite fiber (Celion 6000, Celion 3000, and T‐300) and several resins (epoxy, hot melt‐bismaleimide, solvent bismaleimide, polyimide, and polystyrylpyridine (PSP)) were measured using the short‐beam test. The interlaminar shear strength of epoxy composites was hightest. All other resin composites showed considerably lower shear properties. The shear strengths deereased with temperature, with the loss up to 100°C being more pronounced. The PSP composites did not show a loss in strength in the temperature range investigated (room temperature to 250°C). Boiling the composite samples in water for 24 h resuled in negligible reduction in shear strength in all cases. The interlaminar shear properties depended on the fiberresin interfacial bond, the wetting characteristics of the resin, and the resin meechanical properties. Attempts were made to determine to what extent each of these factors controlled the shear properties of the composites studies. Thus, the interfacial bond between the resin and the single fiber was determined. Results showed that the lower shear strength of polyimide, bisimides and PSP composites, as compared to epoxy resin composites, seemed to be due to their corresponding low interfacial bond strengths. The subsequent decrease in shear strength with temperature appeared to be directly correlated to the decrease in bond strength. The wettability of carbon fiber tow with all these resins was also determined. The small variations in wetting characteristics of the resin did not seem to justify the rather large differences in shear‐strength properties observed.