Premium
Characterization of cellulose nano/microfibril reinforced polypropylene composites processed via solid‐state shear pulverization
Author(s) -
Oliveira Gean Henrique M.,
Maia Thiago H. S.,
Talabi Segun I.,
Canto Leonardo B.,
Lucas Alessandra A.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
polymer composites
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.577
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1548-0569
pISSN - 0272-8397
DOI - 10.1002/pc.25907
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , polypropylene , ultimate tensile strength , cellulose , extrusion , natural fiber , scanning electron microscope , composite number , chemical engineering , engineering
Abstract Polypropylene (PP) composites with cellulose nanofibril (CNF), lignocellulose nanofibril (LCNF) or bleached kraft wood pulp (BWKP) cellulose microfibril compatibilized by maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene were produced by different approaches. Samples containing 10–30 wt% filler were prepared by mixing cellulose aqueous suspensions and PP through solid‐state shear pulverization. The flakes obtained were compounded by twin‐screw melt extrusion (MSE) followed by injection molding (IM) into standard specimens. Reference samples with 30 wt% CNF or LCNF were prepared through a standard procedure, which involved freeze‐drying of nanofibrils aqueous suspensions before MSE and IM, whereas a sample with 30 wt% BWKP was prepared directly by MSE and IM. Injection‐molded specimens were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, and tensile and notched impact tests. The thermal behavior of the PP matrix in the composites was not significantly affected by the filler type and content and processing route as well. CNF and LCNF reinforced PP composites showed inferior mechanical properties, due to the formation of nanofibrils agglomerates in the PP matrix, regardless of the processing route adopted. Highly filled (30 wt%) BWKP composites presented superior mechanical properties with significant increase in the modulus, tensile strength, and impact strength due to the formation of well‐dispersed microfibrils bundles in the PP matrix. A comparative analysis showed that the composites developed in this study present similar or even superior mechanical performance for given filler content to other natural fiber reinforced PP composites reported in the literature.