Premium
A comparative study of rice husk ash and siliceous earth as reinforcing fillers in epoxidized natural rubber composites
Author(s) -
Pongdong Wiphawadee,
Kummerlöwe Claudia,
Vennemann Norbert,
Thitithammawong Anoma,
Nakason Charoen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
polymer composites
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.577
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1548-0569
pISSN - 0272-8397
DOI - 10.1002/pc.23951
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , filler (materials) , natural rubber , ultimate tensile strength , husk , curing (chemistry) , polymer , botany , biology
Rice husk ash (RHA) and siliceous earth (SE) were compared as alternative reinforcing fillers in epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) vulcanizates. The effects of RHA and SE on processability, curing characteristics, mechanical, thermal and morphological properties, and thermoelastic behavior of vulcanizates were studied, in the presence and absence of bis(triethoxysilylpropyl) tetrasulfide (TESPT) silane coupling agent. The results indicated that the RHA offers processing advantages over the commercial SE. The filled ENR vulcanizates without TESPT provided higher tensile strengths than the unfilled ENR vulcanizates, but had lower elongations at break. This is attributed to physical interactions between filler particles and rubber matrix, which affects the reinforcement by the filler. The modification of filler surfaces with TESPT resulted in further improved properties of the rubber vulcanizates. This is attributed to the coupling of polymer matrix and filler particles via TESPT linkages that increased the polymer–filler interactions. It was also found that the RHA filler, a renewable resource, exhibited similar reinforcement to the conventional SE. This indicates that the RHA has great potential as a reinforcing filler that can substitute for conventional SE in polymer composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:414–426, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers