Premium
Comparative study of interlaminar fracture toughness of GFRP with different fiber surface treatments
Author(s) -
Korjakin A.,
Rikards R.,
Buchholz F.G.,
Wang H.,
Bledzki A. K.,
Kessler A.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
polymer composites
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.577
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1548-0569
pISSN - 0272-8397
DOI - 10.1002/pc.10154
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , interphase , fracture toughness , fiber , glass fiber , composite number , polyethylene , fiber pull out , toughness , epoxy , fiber reinforced composite , fracture (geology) , composite laminates , genetics , biology
This investigation is focused on the influence of glass fiber surface treatment on the interlaminar fracture toughness of unidrectional laminates. Three different fiber surface treatments were considered: polyethylene treated fibers to get poor adhesion, silance treated fibers to get good bond strength, and industrial fibers without special treatments with the coupling agents. The interlaminar fracture behavior of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced composites with different fiber surface treatments has been investigated in mode I, mode II, and for the fixed mixed mode I/II ratio 1.33. Double cantilever beam (DCB), end notched flexure (ENF), and mixed mode flexure (MMF) specimens were used. The data obtained from these tests were analyzed by using different analytical approaches and the finite element method. For the fibers treated with the silane coupling agent, a value about 2.5 times higher of mode II interlaminar fracture toughness for crack initiation was obtained in comparison with the polyethylene sized composite. For the composite made from the industrial fibers, a value about 2 times higher was obtained. Because of extensive fiber bridging and pullout in the composites with poor fiber/matrix adhesion, the results of mode I and mixed mode I/II tests did not characterize the interphase quality. In order to determine the interphase quality, the mode II tests are recommended.