z-logo
Premium
Outpatient pain clinic and intranasal fentanyl to improve sickle cell disease outcomes
Author(s) -
Myrick Raven,
Blakemore Shaundra,
Waite Emily,
Pernell Brandi,
MadanSwain Avi,
Hilliard Lee,
Lebensburger Jeffrey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pediatric blood and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.116
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1545-5017
pISSN - 1545-5009
DOI - 10.1002/pbc.28648
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , outpatient clinic , opioid , fentanyl , morphine , anesthesia , receptor , psychiatry
Background Acute pain events are a leading complication for sickle cell patients. In an attempt to improve pain outcomes, we developed an outpatient pain clinic, and included intranasal fentanyl in the opioid emergency department (ED) pain order set. We evaluated admission rates and opioid administration for patients that attended both the outpatient pain clinic and ED within a 3‐month period. Methods We recorded the admission rate, IV morphine equivalents, and time from triage for each opioid order and administration from both an outpatient pain clinic and ED visit within a 3‐month period for an individual pediatric patient with sickle cell disease. Results Thirty patients received acute pain management in both settings. We identified a significant reduction in hospital admission when patients received care in the pain clinic as compared to the ED (17% vs 43%, P =  .02). Additionally, outpatient pain clinic patients received significantly less IV morphine equivalents than patients received in the ED (5.6 vs 10.6 IV morphine equivalents, P  < .0001). In the ED, intranasal fentanyl was administered in a significantly shorter time than patients ordered intravenous opioid (43 vs 75 min, P =  .02). The mean time to receiving an opioid in the outpatient pain clinic was 57 min. Conclusion The use of an outpatient pain clinic can reduce admission rates as compared to the ED. The use of intranasal fentanyl reduced the time to first opioid administration in the ED. Patient‐centered research or quality improvement projects should continue to focus on novel approaches to acute pain event management.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here