Premium
Preclinical evaluation of the combination of AZD1775 and irinotecan against selected pediatric solid tumors: A Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium report
Author(s) -
Kolb E. Anders,
Houghton Peter J.,
Kurmasheva Raushan T.,
Mosse Yael P.,
Maris John M.,
Erickson Stephen W.,
Guo Yuelong,
Teicher Beverly A.,
Smith Malcolm A.,
Gorlick Richard
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pediatric blood and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.116
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1545-5017
pISSN - 1545-5009
DOI - 10.1002/pbc.28098
Subject(s) - irinotecan , medicine , neuroblastoma , wilms' tumor , osteosarcoma , cancer research , pediatric cancer , camptothecin , wee1 , sarcoma , cancer , oncology , pharmacology , cell culture , cell cycle , pathology , biology , colorectal cancer , cyclin dependent kinase 1 , biochemistry , genetics
WEE1 is a serine kinase central to the G 2 checkpoint. Inhibition of WEE1 can lead to cell death by permitting cell‐cycle progression despite unrepaired DNA damage. AZD1775 is a WEE1 inhibitor that is in clinical development for children and adults with cancer. Methods AZD1775 was tested using a dose of 120 mg/kg administered orally for days 1 to 5. Irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg for days 1 to 5 (one hour after AZD1775 when used in combination). AZD1775 and irinotecan were studied alone and in combination in neuroblastoma ( n = 3), osteosarcoma ( n = 4), and Wilms tumor ( n = 3) xenografts. Results AZD1775 as a single agent showed little activity. Irinotecan induced objective responses in two neuroblastoma lines (PRs), and two Wilms tumor models (CR and PR). The combination of AZD1775 + irinotecan‐induced objective responses in two neuroblastoma lines (PR and CR) and all three Wilms tumor lines (CR and 2 PRs). The objective response measure improved compared with single‐agent treatment for one neuroblastoma (PR to CR), two osteosarcoma (PD1 to PD2), and one Wilms tumor (PD2 to PR) xenograft lines. Of note, the combination yielded CR ( n = 1) and PR ( n = 2) in all the Wilms tumor lines. The event‐free survival was significantly longer for the combination compared with single‐agent irinotecan in all models tested. The magnitude of the increase was greatest in osteosarcoma and Wilms tumor xenografts. Conclusions AZD1775 potentiates the effects of irinotecan across most of the xenograft lines tested, with effect size appearing to vary across tumor panels.