Premium
Comparison between piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime monotherapies as an empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with hematological and malignant disorders: A prospective, randomized study
Author(s) -
Sano Hirozumi,
Kobayashi Ryoji,
Suzuki Daisuke,
Kishimoto Kenji,
Yasuda Kazue,
Kobayashi Kunihiko
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pediatric blood and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.116
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1545-5017
pISSN - 1545-5009
DOI - 10.1002/pbc.25178
Subject(s) - medicine , cefepime , piperacillin/tazobactam , febrile neutropenia , piperacillin , tazobactam , neutropenia , blood cancer , adverse effect , empirical treatment , pediatrics , intensive care medicine , chemotherapy , cancer , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , antibiotic resistance , imipenem , bacteria , pseudomonas aeruginosa , biology
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) or cefepime (CFPM) monotherapy for febrile neutropenia (FN) in children, a total of 53 patients with 213 febrile episodes were randomly treated with either PIPC/TAZ 337.5 mg/kg/day, or CFPM 100 mg/kg/day. No significant differences were observed in the success rates of the PIPC/TAZ and CFPM treatments (62.1% vs. 59.1%, P = 0.650). Furthermore, no differences were noted in the rates of new infection and mortality, and no serious adverse effects occurred in either of groups. Both PIPC/TAZ and CFPM were effective and safe as an empirical therapy for FN in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:356–358. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom