Premium
Phase II study of pre‐irradiation chemotherapy for childhood intracranial ependymoma. Children's Cancer Group protocol 9942: A report from the Children's Oncology Group
Author(s) -
Garvin James H.,
Selch Michael T.,
Holmes Emi,
Berger Mitchell S.,
Finlay Jonathan L.,
Flannery Ann,
Goldwein Joel W.,
Packer Roger J.,
RorkeAdams Lucy B.,
ShiminskiMaher Tania,
Sposto Richard,
Stanley Philip,
Tannous Raymond,
Pollack Ian F.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pediatric blood and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.116
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1545-5017
pISSN - 1545-5009
DOI - 10.1002/pbc.24274
Subject(s) - medicine , ependymoma , childhood cancer , pediatric oncology , chemotherapy , blood cancer , oncology , cancer , pediatrics , surgery
Purpose Standard therapy for childhood intracranial ependymoma is maximal tumor resection followed by involved‐field irradiation. Although not used routinely, chemotherapy has produced objective responses in ependymoma, both at recurrence and in infants. Because the presence of residual tumor following surgery is consistently associated with inferior outcome, the potential impact of pre‐irradiation chemotherapy was investigated. Methods Between 1995 and 1999, the Children's Cancer Group undertook a Phase II trial of pre‐irradiation chemotherapy in children 3–21 years of age with intracranial ependymoma and radiological evidence of post‐operative residual tumor. Results Of 84 patients, 41 had residual tumor, and were given four cycles of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy prior to irradiation. Of 35 patients fully evaluable for response to chemotherapy, 14 (40%) demonstrated complete response, 6 (17%) partial response, 10 (29%) minor response or stable disease, and 5 (14%) demonstrated progressive tumor growth. For the entire group, 5‐year overall survival (OS) and event‐free survival (EFS) was 71 ± 6%, and 57 ± 6%, respectively. The pre‐irradiation chemotherapy group demonstrated EFS comparable to that of patients with no residual tumor who received irradiation alone (55 ± 8% vs. 58 ± 9%, P = 0.45). Any benefit of chemotherapy was restricted to patients with greater than 90% tumor resection. Conclusions Children with near total resection of ependymoma may benefit from pre‐irradiation chemotherapy. Patients with subtotal resection have inferior outcome despite responses to chemotherapy, and should be considered for second‐look surgery prior to irradiation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59: 1183–1189. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.