z-logo
Premium
Comparison of two methods for carboplatin dosing in children with retinoblastoma
Author(s) -
Allen Steven,
Wilson Matthew W.,
Watkins Amy,
Billups Catherine,
Qaddoumi Ibrahim,
Haik Barrett H.,
RodriguezGalindo Carlos
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
pediatric blood and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.116
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1545-5017
pISSN - 1545-5009
DOI - 10.1002/pbc.22467
Subject(s) - carboplatin , medicine , dosing , confidence interval , renal function , retinoblastoma , urology , chemotherapy , cisplatin , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
Background Carboplatin is the most effective drug in retinoblastoma but systemic clearance is variable in young patients. While most regimens use a flat dose, individualized targeting may provide a more adjusted systemic exposure. Patients and Methods We compared carboplatin doses between two groups of children with retinoblastoma that were treated using a flat dose of 560 mg/m 2 or a targeted AUC of 6.5 using a modified Calvert formula. Results Ninety‐eight patients with retinoblastoma received a total of 576 cycles of carboplatin (median 8 cycles). Fifty patients (51%) received a fixed dose per m 2 , 32 (33%) received a dose based on AUC, 1 patient received fixed dose per kilogram, and in 15 patients a combination AUC and fixed doses was used. The median cumulative carboplatin dose (mg/m 2 ) for patients who received eight cycles using fixed per m 2 dosing was 2151.8 (range, 1414.2–2852.0), compared to 1104.1 for nine patients who received eight cycles using Calvert dosing (range, 779.0–1992.7) ( P  < 0.001). For cycles given using AUC, the median percentage of the hypothetical fixed per m 2 dose was 70% (range, 48–134%). Younger patients had larger differences. Patients receiving carboplatin based on fixed per m 2 dosing were 3.0 times more likely to have a platelet transfusion (95% confidence interval, 1.3–7.3). Conclusions Carboplatin administration needs to consider the changes in renal function occurring during the first months of life. The use of a targeted AUC provides the most accurate method; however, mg per kg of body weight dosing is a very reliable alternative method. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;55:47–54. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom