z-logo
Premium
Screening for prostatic cancer and its evolution within Britain
Author(s) -
Parkinson M. C.,
Bott S. R. J.,
Montironi R.,
Melia J.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the journal of pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.964
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1096-9896
pISSN - 0022-3417
DOI - 10.1002/path.1088
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , workload , cancer , medicine , gynecology , cancer detection , prostate , histopathology , prostate cancer screening , prostate specific antigen , pathology , computer science , operating system
The arguments for and against screening for prostatic cancer are frequently discussed (Albertsen PC. Screening for prostate cancer is neither appropriate nor cost‐effective. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23 : 521–530; Schroder FH, Alexander FE, Bangma CH, Hugosson J, Smith DS. Screening and early detection of prostate cancer. Prostate 2000; 44 : 255–263). In contrast, this paper outlines how screening became possible, why the decision was made not to initiate a national screening programme in Britain, the other pathways being pursued, and the current problems, in particular the issue of histopathology workload. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom