Premium
Changes in the mechanical properties of tooth‐colored direct restorative materials in relation to time
Author(s) -
Saygılı Gülbin,
Şahmalı Sevil,
Demirel Figen
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
polymers for advanced technologies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.61
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1099-1581
pISSN - 1042-7147
DOI - 10.1002/pat.413
Subject(s) - flexural strength , materials science , flexural modulus , composite material , vickers hardness test , modulus , composite number , indentation hardness , three point flexural test , microstructure
The objective of this study was to determine the flexural strength, flexural modulus, Vickers hardness of a packable composite (Surefil), and an ormocer (Definite) in comparison with a microhybrid composite (Z‐100), a microfil composite (Silux Plus) and a polyacid‐modified composite resin (Dyract). Flexural strength and flexural modulus were determined using a three‐point bending device. Microhardness was measured with a Vickers indentor. The specimens of each material were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were stored in artificial saliva at pH 6, all at 37°C. The groups were tested at the beginning of the test, at 3 months and at 6 months. Flexural strength values of Surefil and Definite showed a progressive increase. The highest MPa values were determined for Surefil (134.4 MPa) and the lowest MPa values were obtained for Dyract (59.6 MPa). The highest flexural modulus values were revealed for Surefil (10.000 GPa). Z‐100, Silux Plus and Definite showed a tendency to decline in relation to time for their flexural modulus. GPa values of Silux Plus were stable at 3 and 6 months. Vickers hardness numbers showed that Surefil was the hardest and Dyract was the weakest material. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.