Open Access
Indigenous food harvesting as social–ecological monitoring: A case study with the Gitga'at First Nation
Author(s) -
Thompson KimLy,
Hill Cameron,
Ojeda Jaime,
Ban Natalie C.,
Picard Chris R.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
people and nature
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2575-8314
DOI - 10.1002/pan3.10135
Subject(s) - indigenous , ecological resilience , conceptual framework , ecological systems theory , traditional knowledge , adaptive management , natural resource management , environmental resource management , psychological resilience , natural resource , resource (disambiguation) , resilience (materials science) , geography , ecology , environmental planning , sociology , social science , environmental science , psychology , computer science , computer network , physics , psychotherapist , biology , thermodynamics
Abstract Indigenous peoples have been monitoring and managing the natural resources in their homelands and waters for millennia. Meanwhile, social–ecological systems thinkers are embracing the capacity of Indigenous knowledge systems, which are informed by land‐based practices, to inform adaptive management. Following the collaborative design of a community‐based social–ecological monitoring system over two traditional seafood harvesting seasons, we conducted a conceptual framework analysis of meeting notes and interview transcripts with Gitga'at harvesters and knowledge holders to discern how Gitga'at people monitor their territory and what indicators they focus on. An interconnected set of social–ecological concepts and indicators emerged, evidencing an intrinsic part of Gitga'at life: Gitga'at harvesters closely monitor their coastal social–ecological system through ongoing land‐ and sea‐based practices. The conceptual framework highlights the importance of maintaining and revitalizing Indigenous knowledge and harvesting practices to inform social–ecological monitoring and adaptive management at local and broader scales. Amidst discussions of marine and coastal resource co‐management in British Columbia, our results also suggest opportunities for scientific approaches to situate themselves within and support existing Indigenous frameworks and priorities. This research also adds to the discussion on the development of appropriate regional and global indicators and frameworks to monitor the resilience of social–ecological systems. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.