Premium
Time–accurate Modular CFD‐CSD Coupling for Aeroelastic Rotor Simulations
Author(s) -
Altmikus A.,
Wagner S.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
pamm
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1617-7061
DOI - 10.1002/pamm.200310005
Subject(s) - aeroelasticity , aerodynamics , flutter , coupling (piping) , modular design , modularity (biology) , computer science , rotor (electric) , boundary value problem , partial differential equation , field (mathematics) , computational fluid dynamics , fluid–structure interaction , stability (learning theory) , control theory (sociology) , mathematics , mechanical engineering , aerospace engineering , engineering , finite element method , mathematical analysis , structural engineering , control (management) , machine learning , artificial intelligence , biology , pure mathematics , genetics , operating system
This paper addresses the timewise accuracy of different coupling approaches applied to instationary aeroelastic simulations of rotors in forward flight. Two different approaches which are widely discussed in literature are examined: the tight or strong coupling, and the fully integrated or monolithic coupling. Strong coupling means an exchange of fluid loads and structural deformations at each time step which is effectuated in a fully modular manner. We will address aspects of conservativity and time‐accuracy, and will present results for a helicopter forward flight scenario. However, objections concerning the correct solution of the global non‐linear three field problem – structure, grid deformation, aerodynamics – remain. These objections are normally rejected by the monolithic approach. Here, a common set of partial differential equations is derived and solved in a single code. However, a truly monolithic system of equations is only needed for stability analysis, and it can be decomposed in a three field problem respecting appropriate boundary conditions for each domain. Thus, modularity can be maintained, conceiving a quasi‐monolithic procedure, when both domains are simultaneously solved in a common non‐linear iteration loop on a per time‐step basis. First results will be shown for a 2D flutter testcase.