z-logo
Premium
Why policy analysis and ethics are incompatible
Author(s) -
Amy Douglas J.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
journal of policy analysis and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.898
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1520-6688
pISSN - 0276-8739
DOI - 10.1002/pam.4050030407
Subject(s) - neglect , normative , bureaucracy , legislator , politics , field (mathematics) , policy analysis , normative ethics , positive economics , political science , inclusion (mineral) , law and economics , sociology , law , economics , social science , psychology , legislation , mathematics , psychiatry , pure mathematics
Commentators in the field of policy analysis have argued persuasively for the inclusion of ethical evaluations in the analytic process, yet most practitioners in the policy field avoid analyzing moral issues. Standard explanations for this neglect of ethics tend to be inadequate; assertions that normative analysis is unnecessary, impractical, impossible, or undesirable are demonstrably weak. Political factors, on the other hand, provide a clearer understanding of the neglect of ethics. Ethical inquiry is shunned because it frequently threatens the professional and political interests of both analysts and policymakers. The administrator, the legislator, the bureaucracy, and the profession of policy analysis itself all resist the potential challenges of moral evaluation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here