z-logo
Premium
The game of manifestos!
Author(s) -
Pandey Ashish
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of public affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.221
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1479-1854
pISSN - 1472-3891
DOI - 10.1002/pa.1917
Subject(s) - manifesto , lying , politics , simple (philosophy) , law and economics , economics , microeconomics , political science , business , social psychology , computer science , public relations , psychology , law , epistemology , philosophy , medicine , radiology
This paper investigates, leveraging a simple two‐stage game with incomplete information, the motivation behind announcing unreasonable commitments in the manifesto by candidates and political parties. I analyse the expected communication pattern in an environment where legal costs are not imposed for broken promises and psychological costs related to lying are not incurred by candidates. I demonstrate that there is an absence of separation between a high‐type candidate and a low‐type candidate regarding the degree to which they indulge in “cheap talk.” This paper also analyses the introduction of a penalty for broken promises and establishes that an imposition of penalty has the potential to improve the behaviour of political parties by inducing separation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here