Premium
Comparative lobbying research: advances, shortcomings and recommendations
Author(s) -
Kanol Direnç
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of public affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.221
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1479-1854
pISSN - 1472-3891
DOI - 10.1002/pa.1527
Subject(s) - corporatism , pluralism (philosophy) , qualitative comparative analysis , positive economics , function (biology) , political science , sociology , epistemology , public relations , economics , computer science , law , philosophy , machine learning , evolutionary biology , politics , biology
This review article suggests that there is a new school of comparative lobbying emerging. However, this development is taking place only gradually. Unlike the earlier studies, which studied corporatism/pluralism, outside lobbying and lobbying regulations, the new comparativists are mainly focusing on inside lobbying strategies and success as a function of country‐level factors. Yet, the literature still suffers from underdeveloped theories. I stress that our knowledge can be improved with better theorizing. Better theories, in turn, can be formulated by improving the use of quantitative data gathering, qualitative research, formal models and better communication between researchers working with different methodologies in different disciplines. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.