Open AccessReliability and validity of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS – short form) and the Adolescent Leisure Interest Profile (ALIP)
Author(s) -
Trottier Angela N.,
Brown G. Ted,
Hobson Sandra J.G.,
Miller William
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
occupational therapy international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.414
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1557-0703
pISSN - 0966-7903
DOI - 10.1002/oti.161
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , internal consistency , scale (ratio) , test (biology) , concurrent validity , psychometrics , clinical psychology , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS – short form) and the Adolescent Leisure Interest Profile (ALIP). The LSS and the ALIP are instruments that occupational therapists can use to evaluate the leisure activities that clients enjoy. Evaluation of leisure interest and participation will assist in creating goals for therapy to maximize a client's ability to participate in leisure activities. This study examined the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the LSS and the ALIP using a sample of 37 adolescents between the ages of 13 and 17 with no known impairments. The assessments were administered individually or in small groups 7 to 17 days apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency. Pearson product moment correlations were calculated to examine the test–retest reliability of the 60 subscales and the six question totals of the ALIP, as well as for the 6 subscales and total score of the LSS. Concurrent validity was evaluated between the ‘How often?’ question of the ALIP and the LSS (short form). Based on the study results, the ALIP and the LSS seem to have good test–retest reliability levels when used with adolescents with no known physical or mental impairments. The concurrent validity between the two instruments was not supported, with many of the scores indicating only weak or no association to each of the subscales, suggesting that the assessments differ in some fundamental way. However, the evidence of some relationships between subscales may indicate some areas where the ALIP and the LSS are similar. Copyright © 2002 Whurr Publishers Ltd.