Open AccessValidated methods for identifying individuals with obesity in health care administrative databases: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Samadoulougou Sékou,
Idzerda Leanne,
Dault Roxane,
Lebel Alexandre,
Cloutier AnneMarie,
Vanasse Alain
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
obesity science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2055-2238
DOI - 10.1002/osp4.450
Subject(s) - medicine , obesity , identification (biology) , systematic review , health care , inclusion and exclusion criteria , medline , public health , database , diagnosis code , gerontology , environmental health , population , alternative medicine , pathology , political science , computer science , law , economics , economic growth , botany , biology
Summary Background Health care administrative databases are increasingly used for health studies and public health surveillance. Cases of individuals with obesity are selected using case‐identification methods. However, the validity of these methods is fragmentary and particularly challenging for obesity case identification. Objective The objectives of this systematic review are to (1) determine the case‐identification methods used to identify individuals with obesity in health care administrative databases and (2) to summarize the validity of these case‐identification methods when compared with a reference standard. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in six bibliographic databases for the period January 1980 to June 2019 for all studies evaluating obesity case‐identification methods compared with a reference standard. Results Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were the only case‐identification method utilized in selected articles. The performance of obesity‐identification methods varied widely across studies, with positive predictive value ranging from 19% to 100% while sensitivity ranged from 3% to 92%. The sensitivity of these methods was usually low while the specificity was higher. Conclusion When obesity is reported in health care administrative databases, it is usually correctly reported; however, obesity tends to be highly underreported in databases. Therefore, case‐identification methods to monitor the prevalence and incidence of obesity within health care administrative databases are not reliable. In contrast, the use of these methods remains relevant for the selection of individuals with obesity for cohort studies, particularly when identifying cohorts of individuals with severe obesity or cohorts where obesity is associated with comorbidities.