Open AccessDigital self‐monitoring: Does adherence or association with outcomes differ by self‐monitoring target?
Author(s) -
Butryn Meghan L.,
Godfrey Kathryn M.,
Martinelli Mary K.,
Roberts Savannah R.,
Forman Evan M.,
Zhang Fengqing
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
obesity science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2055-2238
DOI - 10.1002/osp4.391
Subject(s) - self monitoring , medicine , weight loss , physical activity , body weight , activity monitor , physical therapy , healthy eating , obesity , psychology , social psychology
Summary Objective Digital self‐monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight is increasingly prescribed in behavioural weight loss programmes. This study determined if adherence rates or associations with outcomes differed according to self‐monitoring target (ie, self‐monitoring of eating versus physical activity versus weight). Methods Participants in a 3‐month, group‐based weight loss programme were instructed to use an app to record food intake, wear a physical activity sensor, and use a wireless body weight scale. At post‐treatment, weight loss was measured in clinic and moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured by research‐grade accelerometer. Results Adherence to self‐monitoring decreased significantly over time for eating and weight but not physical activity. Overall, adherence to self‐monitoring of weight was lower than that of eating or physical activity. Greater adherence to self‐monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight each predicted greater weight loss. Only greater adherence to self‐monitoring of eating was associated with greater bouted minutes of MVPA. Conclusions Findings from this study suggest that self‐monitoring should be considered a target‐specific behaviour rather than a unitary construct when conceptualizing adherence and association with treatment outcomes.