z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Facet‐Control versus Co‐Catalyst‐Control in Photocatalytic H 2 Evolution from Anatase TiO 2 Nanocrystals
Author(s) -
Qin Shanshan,
Shui Lancang,
Osuagwu Benedict,
Denisov Nikita,
Tesler Alexander B.,
Schmuki Patrik
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
chemistryopen
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 29
ISSN - 2191-1363
DOI - 10.1002/open.202200010
Subject(s) - anatase , facet (psychology) , nanocrystal , photocatalysis , catalysis , materials science , nanotechnology , chemical engineering , chemistry , engineering , psychology , organic chemistry , social psychology , personality , big five personality traits
Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) and, in particular, its anatase polymorph, is widely studied for photocatalytic H 2 production. In the present work, we examine the importance of reactive facets of anatase crystallites on the photocatalytic H 2 evolution from aqueous methanol solutions. For this, we synthesized anatase TiO 2 nanocrystals with a large amount of either {001} facets, that is, nanosheets, or {101} facets, that is, octahedral nanocubes, and examined their photocatalytic H 2 evolution and then repeated this procedure with samples where Pt co‐catalyst is present on all facets. Octahedral nanocubes with abundant {101} facets produce >4 times more H 2 than nanosheets enriched in {001} facets if the reaction is carried out under co‐catalyst‐free conditions. For samples that carry Pt co‐catalyst on both {001} and {101} facets, faceting loses entirely its significance. This demonstrates that the beneficial role of faceting, namely the introduction of {101} facets that act as electron transfer mediator is relevant only for co‐catalyst‐free TiO 2 surfaces.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom