z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Thermochemistry of London Dispersion‐Driven Transition Metal Reactions: Getting the ‘Right Answer for the Right Reason’
Author(s) -
Hansen Andreas,
Bannwarth Christoph,
Grimme Stefan,
Petrović Predrag,
Werlé Christophe,
Djukic Jean-Pierre
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
chemistryopen
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 29
ISSN - 2191-1363
DOI - 10.1002/open.201402017
Subject(s) - thermochemistry , chemistry , thermodynamics , solvation , density functional theory , gibbs free energy , transition metal , dispersion (optics) , intramolecular force , computational chemistry , molecule , physics , quantum mechanics , organic chemistry , catalysis
Reliable thermochemical measurements and theoretical predictions for reactions involving large transition metal complexes in which long‐range intramolecular London dispersion interactions contribute significantly to their stabilization are still a challenge, particularly for reactions in solution. As an illustrative and chemically important example, two reactions are investigated where a large dipalladium complex is quenched by bulky phosphane ligands (triphenylphosphane and tricyclohexylphosphane). Reaction enthalpies and Gibbs free energies were measured by isotherm titration calorimetry (ITC) and theoretically ‘back‐corrected’ to yield 0 K gas‐phase reaction energies (Δ E ). It is shown that the Gibbs free solvation energy calculated with continuum models represents the largest source of error in theoretical thermochemistry protocols. The (‘back‐corrected’) experimental reaction energies were used to benchmark (dispersion‐corrected) density functional and wave function theory methods. Particularly, we investigated whether the atom‐pairwise D3 dispersion correction is also accurate for transition metal chemistry, and how accurately recently developed local coupled‐cluster methods describe the important long‐range electron correlation contributions. Both, modern dispersion‐corrected density functions (e.g., PW6B95‐D3(BJ) or B3LYP‐NL), as well as the now possible DLPNO‐CCSD(T) calculations, are within the ‘experimental’ gas phase reference value. The remaining uncertainties of 2–3 kcal mol −1 can be essentially attributed to the solvation models. Hence, the future for accurate theoretical thermochemistry of large transition metal reactions in solution is very promising.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here