Premium
The role of ion–neutral complexes in the reactions of onium ions and related species
Author(s) -
Bowen Richard D.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
organic mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 0030-493X
DOI - 10.1002/oms.1210281234
Subject(s) - chemistry , oxonium ion , ion , proton , onium , cationic polymerization , enthalpy , proton affinity , reactivity (psychology) , medicinal chemistry , organic chemistry , protonation , medicine , physics , alternative medicine , pathology , quantum mechanics
An account is given of the development of the proposal that ion–neutral complexes are involved in the unimolecular reactions of onium ions (R 1 R 2 CZ + R 3 ; Z = O, S, NR 4 ; R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , R 4 = H, C n H 2 n + 1 ), with particular emphasis on the informative C 4 H 9 O + oxonium ion system (Z = O; R 1 , R 2 = H; R 3 = C 3 H 7 ). Current ideas on the role of ion‐neutral complexes in cation rearrangements, hydrogen transfer processes and more complex isomerizations are illustrated by considering the behaviour of isomeric CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 X + and (CH 3 ) 2 CHX + species [X = CH 2 O, CH 3 CHO, H 2 O, CH 3 OH, NH 3 , NH 2 CH 3 , NH(CH 3 ) 2 , CH 2 NH, CH 2 NCH 3 , CO, CH 3 ˙, Br˙ and I˙]. Attention is focused on the importance of four energetic factors (the stabilization energy of the ion–neutral complex, the energy released by rearrangement of the cationic component, the enthalpy change for proton transfer between the partners of the ion neutral complex and the ergicity of recombination of the components) which influence the reactivity of the complexes. The nature and extent of the chemistry involving ion‐neutral complexes depend on the relative magnitudes of these parameters. Thus, when the magnitude of the stabilization energy exceeds the energy released by cation rearrangement, the ergicity of proton transfer is small, and recombination of the components in a new way is energetically favourable, extensive complex‐mediated isomerizations tend to occur. Loss of H 2 O from metastable CH 2 O + C 3 H 7 ions is an example of such a reaction. Conversely, if the stabilization energy is small compared with the magnitude of the energy released by eation rearrangement, the opportunities for complex‐mediated processes to become manifest are decreased, especially if proton transfer is endoergic. Thus, CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CO + expels CO, with an increased kinetic energy release, after rate‐limiting isomerization of CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 + CO to (CH 3 ) 2 CH + CO has taken place. When proton transfer between the components of the complex is strongly exoergic, fragmentation corresponding to single hydrogen transfer occurs readily. The proton‐transfer step is often preceded by cation rearrangement for CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 X + species. In such circumstances, the involvement of ion–neutral complexes can be detected by the observation of unusual site selectivity in the hydrogen‐transfer step. Thus, C 3 H 6 loss from CH 2 N + (R 1 )CH 2 CH 2 CH 3 (R 1 = H, CH 3 , C 3 H 7 ) immonium ions is found by 2 H‐labelling experiments to proceed via preferential α‐and γ‐hydrogen transfer; this finding is explained if the incipient + CH 2 CH 2 CH 3 ion isomerizes to CH 3 CH + CH 3 prior to proton abstraction. In contrast, the isomeric CH 2 N + (R 1 )CH(CH 3 ) 2 species undergo specific β‐hydrogen transfer because the developing CH 3 CH + CH 3 cation is stable with respect to rearrangements involving a 1,2‐H shift.