z-logo
Premium
Unimolecular reactions of ionized methyl acetate and its hydrogen‐rearranged isomers
Author(s) -
Wesdemiotis Chrysostomos,
Csencsits Roseann,
McLafferty Fred W.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
organic mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 0030-493X
DOI - 10.1002/oms.1210200206
Subject(s) - chemistry , isomerization , dissociation (chemistry) , metastability , ion , mass spectrum , electron ionization , kinetic energy , hydrogen , scrambling , stereochemistry , spectral line , medicinal chemistry , photochemistry , ionization , organic chemistry , linguistics , physics , philosophy , quantum mechanics , astronomy , catalysis
The proposed formation of [CH 3 C(OH)OCH 2 ] + ˙ ( b ) as the intermediate in the isomerization [CH 2 C(OH)OCH 3 ] + ˙ ( c )⇄ b ⇄[CH 3 COOCH 3 ] + ˙ ( c has been confirmed by preparation of b from CH 3 COOCH 2 OCH 3 . For the three isomers a–c the dominant metastable ion (MI) dissociation, CH 3 O˙ loss, involves identical kinetic energy release values. The kinetic barriers for a ⇄ b and b ⇄ c must be nearly as high as that for CH 3 O˙ loss from c , as shown by the insensitivity of the mass spectra from collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) of a–c to ionizing electron energy. The H/D scrambling of metastable [CH 2 C(OD)OCH 3 ] + ˙ and c –D 3 ions confirm this, indicating that the barrier for a ⇄ b is slightly below that for b ⇄ c . Minor low‐energy dissociations include losses of CH 4 and CH 3 OH from a and losses of ˙CHO and CH 2 O from b . Comparison of MI and CAD spectra of a–c with those from [CH 3 (OH)CH 2 O] + ˙ ( d ) and [CH 3 COCH 2 OH] + ˙ ( e ) give no evidence for skeletal rearrangement of a–c to d or e .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom