Premium
Salmon peptides limit obesity‐associated metabolic disorders by modulating a gut‐liver axis in vitamin D‐deficient mice
Author(s) -
Valle Marion,
Mitchell Patricia L.,
Pilon Geneviève,
Varin Thibault,
Hénault Loïc,
Rolin Jonathan,
McLeod Roger,
Gill Tom,
Richard Denis,
Vohl MarieClaude,
Jacques Hélène,
Gag Claudia,
Bazinet Laurent,
Marette André
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1002/oby.23244
Subject(s) - medicine , endocrinology , metabolic syndrome , gut flora , nonalcoholic fatty liver disease , vitamin , adipokine , vitamin d and neurology , apolipoprotein b , inflammation , fatty liver , insulin resistance , obesity , immunology , cholesterol , disease
Objective This study investigated the effects of a low‐dose salmon peptide fraction (SPF) and vitamin D 3 (VitD 3 ) in obese and VitD 3 ‐deficient mice at risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods Obese and VitD 3 ‐deficient low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) −/− /apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB) 100/100 mice were treated with high‐fat high‐sucrose diets, with 25% of dietary proteins replaced by SPF or a nonfish protein mix (MP). The SPF and MP groups received a VitD 3 ‐deficient diet or a supplementation of 15,000 IU of VitD 3 per kilogram of diet. Glucose homeostasis, atherosclerosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and gut health were assessed. Results VitD 3 supplementation increased plasma 25‐hydroxyvitamin D to optimal status whereas the VitD 3 ‐deficient diet maintained moderate deficiency. SPF‐treated groups spent more energy and accumulated less visceral fat in association with an improved adipokine profile. SPF lowered homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance compared with MP, suggesting that SPF can improve insulin sensitivity. SPF alone blunted hepatic and colonic inflammation, whereas VitD 3 supplementation attenuated ileal inflammation. These effects were associated with changes in gut microbiota such as increased Mogibacterium and Muribaculaceae. Conclusions SPF treatment improves MetS by modulating hepatic and gut inflammation along with gut microbiota, suggesting that SPF operates through a gut‐liver axis. VitD 3 supplementation has limited influence on MetS in this model.