Premium
Cost‐Effectiveness of a Weight Loss Intervention: An Adaptation of the Look AHEAD Lifestyle Intervention in the US Military
Author(s) -
Manz Karina C.,
Waters Teresa M.,
Clifton Hannah E.,
Kocak Mehmet,
Klesges Robert C.,
Talcott G. Wayne,
Krukowski Rebecca A.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1002/oby.22681
Subject(s) - medicine , weight loss , waist , active duty , quality adjusted life year , cost effectiveness , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , physical therapy , demography , gerontology , military personnel , obesity , risk analysis (engineering) , political science , law , sociology , psychiatry
Objective This study aimed to assess whether a counselor‐initiated (CI) adaptation of the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) intensive lifestyle intervention in a military setting was cost‐effective relative to a self‐paced (SP) adaptation. Methods A cost‐effectiveness analysis from a payer perspective was performed alongside a 2014‐2017 randomized behavioral weight loss trial among 248 active‐duty military personnel stationed at a US Air Force base in Texas. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were calculated for weight loss, reductions in waist circumference, and quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs). Results After 12 months, the CI adaptation cost more per participant compared with the SP adaptation ($1,081 vs. $120) but achieved greater weight loss (1.86 kg vs. 0.06 kg), greater reductions in waist circumference (1.85 cm vs. 0.48 cm), and more QALYs (0.871 vs. 0.856). The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio for the CI adaptation relative to the SP adaptation was $61,268 per additional QALY. At willingness‐to‐pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY, the CI adaptation was 45% and 49% likely to be cost‐effective, respectively. Conclusions The CI delivery of the Look AHEAD Intensive Lifestyle Intervention may offer a cost‐effective approach to tackle excess weight in the US military.