Premium
Six Weeks of Morning Fasting Causes Little Adaptation of Metabolic or Appetite Responses to Feeding in Adults with Obesity
Author(s) -
Chowdhury Enhad A.,
Richardson Judith D.,
Gonzalez Javier T.,
Tsintzas Kostas,
Thompson Dylan,
Betts James A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1002/oby.22452
Subject(s) - appetite , morning , peptide yy , medicine , endocrinology , ghrelin , thermogenesis , postprandial , obesity , leptin , area under the curve , hormone , insulin , neuropeptide y receptor , neuropeptide , receptor
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effects of sustained morning fasting or breakfast consumption on metabolism, energy intake, and appetite in healthy adults with obesity. Methods An independent‐measures randomized controlled trial with baseline and follow‐up laboratory assessment days separated by a 6‐week intervention of either morning fasting (0 kcal until 12:00 pm ) or daily breakfast (> 700 kcal by 11:00 am ) was performed. Measures included metabolic outcomes (glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids), hormones regulating appetite (total/acylated ghrelin, peptide YY, leptin), and energy expenditure (diet‐induced thermogenesis) parameters throughout a laboratory test day and ad libitum intake following a fixed breakfast. Results Allocation to fasting versus breakfast resulted in minimal adaptation as reflected by the metabolic outcomes or the majority of appetite regulatory outcomes for either area under curve or time‐course‐based measures ( P > 0.05). Ad libitum lunch intake was not different ( P = 0.13), nor was diet‐induced thermogenesis or a composite appetite score (both P > 0.10). However, there was a reduced total area under the curve for peptide YY ( P = 0.05) and increased postprandial hunger ratings ( P = 0.05) in the breakfast group. Conclusions There was little evidence of metabolic adaptation to acute feeding or negative consequences from sustained morning fasting. This indicates that previously observed differences between breakfast consumers and skippers may be acute effects of feeding or may have resulted from other lifestyle factors.