Premium
Comparative analysis of three human adipocyte size measurement methods and their relevance for cardiometabolic risk
Author(s) -
Laforest Sofia,
Michaud Andréanne,
Paris Gaétan,
Pelletier Mélissa,
Vidal Hubert,
Géloën Alain,
Tchernof André
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1002/oby.21697
Subject(s) - adipocyte , medicine , endocrinology , insulin resistance , adipose tissue , adiponectin , population , leptin , homeostatic model assessment , insulin , obesity , environmental health
Objective To determine whether adipocyte diameters from three measurement methods are similarly associated with adiposity measurements and cardiometabolic variables. Methods Surgical samples of omental and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue were obtained in a sample of 60 women (age 35–59 years; body mass index 20.3–41.1 kg/m 2 ). Median adipocyte diameter of the main cell population was determined by collagenase digestion, osmium tetroxide fixation, and histological analysis. Adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed. Results Adipocyte diameter was consistently smaller with formalin fixation than with collagenase digestion, whereas osmium‐fixed cells were larger ( P < 0.0001, for all). Median adipocyte diameters derived from all methods were intercorrelated ( r = 0.46–0.83, P < 0.001 for all). Positive associations were found between adipocyte diameters from all techniques and regional or total adiposity measurements ( P < 0.01 for all). Omental adipocyte diameter was positively associated with fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance ( r = 0.30–0.52, P < 0.05 for all), with osmium‐fixed cell size as a stronger correlate. Osmium‐fixed cell diameter was also a better correlate of plasma adiponectin and leptin. Conclusions Although measurement techniques generated systematic differences in adipocyte size, associations with adiposity were only slightly affected by the technique. Osmium fixation generated stronger associations with cardiometabolic risk factors than collagenase digestion and histological analysis.