Premium
Validity of body adiposity index in predicting body fat in a sample of brazilian women
Author(s) -
Cerqueira Matheus,
Amorim Paulo,
Magalhães Filipe,
Castro Eliane,
Franco Frederico,
Franceschini Sylvia,
Cerqueira Lizbeth,
Marins João,
Doimo Leonice
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1002/oby.20543
Subject(s) - concordance , medicine , concordance correlation coefficient , body adiposity index , bland–altman plot , correlation coefficient , dual energy x ray absorptiometry , limits of agreement , pearson product moment correlation coefficient , body mass index , body fat percentage , standard error , correlation , gold standard (test) , kappa , nuclear medicine , mathematics , statistics , classification of obesity , fat mass , bone mineral , geometry , osteoporosis
Objective This study aimed to verify the validity of BAI in predicting %BF in a sample of Brazilian women Design and Methods A total of 102 women (average age 60.3 ± 9.8) were assessed. To determine percentage body fat (% BF), dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used as the “gold standard.” To evaluate the association between body adiposity index (BAI) and % BF assessed by DXA, we used Pearson's correlation coefficient. Paired sample t ‐test was used to test differences in mean % BF between BAI and DXA. To evaluate the concordance between % BF measured by DXA and estimated by BAI, we used the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and the agreement analysis of Bland‐Altman. Results The correlation between % BF obtained by DXA and that estimated by BAI was r = 0.65, P < 0.001. Paired t ‐test showed significant mean difference between methods ( P < 0.0001). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was C_b = 0.73, which is classified as poor, while the Bland‐Altman plots showed BAI underestimating % BF in relation to the used criterion measure in a large portion of the sample. Conclusions Results of the present study show that BAI presented low agreement with % BF measured by DXA, which is not recommended for % BF prediction in this studied sample.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom