z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Paradoxes of person‐centred care: A discussion paper
Author(s) -
Summer Meranius Martina,
Holmström Inger K.,
Håkansson Jakob,
Breitholtz Agneta,
Moniri Farah,
Skogevall Sofia,
Skoglund Karin,
Rasoal Dara
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
nursing open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.55
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2054-1058
DOI - 10.1002/nop2.520
Subject(s) - scopus , empathy , personhood , medline , web of science , psychology , work (physics) , health care , public relations , knowledge management , engineering ethics , computer science , social psychology , political science , engineering , law , mechanical engineering
Aim Previous research has mainly focused on the advantages of PCC and less on its disadvantages. Hence, there is a need to further explore the recent research regarding PCC from both sides. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of PCC. Design Discussion paper. Methods We searched relevant literature published January 2000–March 2018 in PubMed, Medline, CHINAL, Scopus and Web of Science. Results The results showed that PCC can contribute to improved health and well‐being, improved mutual interaction in relationships, improved cost‐effectiveness and improved work environment , while the disadvantages can involve increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of certain groups, increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of staff's personhood and unfairness due to empathy . An analysis of the existing literature on PCC showed paradoxes, which call for further investigation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here