Premium
c‐Type method of unified CAMG and FEA. Part 1: Beam and arch mega‐elements—3D linear and 2D non‐linear
Author(s) -
Ray Debabrata
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.816
Subject(s) - finite element method , type (biology) , context (archaeology) , basis function , mathematics , arch , computer science , algorithm , mathematical analysis , structural engineering , engineering , ecology , paleontology , biology
Computer‐aided mesh generation (CAMG) dictated solely by the minimal key set of requirements of geometry, material, loading and support condition can produce ‘mega‐sized’, arbitrary‐shaped distorted elements. However, this may result in substantial cost saving and reduced bookkeeping for the subsequent finite element analysis (FEA) and reduced engineering manpower requirement for final quality assurance. A method, denoted as c‐type, has been proposed by constructively defining a finite element space whereby the above hurdles may be overcome with a minimal number of hyper‐sized elements. Bezier (and de Boor) control vectors are used as the generalized displacements and the Bernstein polynomials (and B‐splines) as the elemental basis functions. A concomitant idea of coerced parametry and inter‐element continuity on demand unifies modelling and finite element method. The c‐type method may introduce additional control, namely, an inter‐element continuity condition to the existing h‐type and p‐type methods. Adaptation of the c‐type method to existing commercial and general‐purpose computer programs based on a conventional displacement‐based finite element method is straightforward. The c‐type method with associated subdivision technique can be easily made into a hierarchic adaptive computer method with a suitable a posteriori error analysis. In this context, a summary of a geometrically exact non‐linear formulation for the two‐dimensional curved beams/arches is presented. Several beam problems ranging from truly three‐dimensional tortuous linear curved beams to geometrically extremely non‐linear two‐dimensional arches are solved to establish numerical efficiency of the method. Incremental Lagrangian curvilinear formulation may be extended to overcome rotational singularity in 3D geometric non‐linearity and to treat general material non‐linearity. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.