z-logo
Premium
Bounds approximation of limit‐state surface based on active learning Kriging model with truncated candidate region for random‐interval hybrid reliability analysis
Author(s) -
Yang Xufeng,
Wang Tai,
Li Jincheng,
Chen Zhang
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.6269
Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , kriging , random variable , limit state design , probabilistic logic , random field , mathematics , limit (mathematics) , mathematical optimization , algorithm , computer science , engineering , statistics , mathematical analysis , physics , power (physics) , structural engineering , quantum mechanics
Summary This article reports a brand‐new methodology based on active learning Kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis (HRA) with both random and interval variables. Unlike probabilistic reliability analysis, the limit state surface (LSS) of HRA is projected into a banded region in the domain of random variables. Only approximating the bounds of the banded region is able to meet the accuracy requirement of HRA. In the proposed methodology, the HRA problem is innovatively transformed into a traditional system reliability analysis (SRA) problem with numerous failure modes. And then a basic idea from the field of SRA is borrowed into HRA, and the so‐called truncated candidate region (TCR) for HRA is proposed. In each iteration, the negligible region which probably does not influence the bounds estimation of failure probability is truncated from the original candidate region, and the optimal training point is chosen from the TCR. After several iterations, the TCR will converge to the true ideal candidate region, that is, the candidate region without the inner part of LSS, and the added training points will be driven to the region around the bounds of LSS. The performance of the proposed method is compared with relevant methods by five case studies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here