Premium
Mesh refinement strategies without mapping of nonlinear solutions for the generalized and standard FEM analysis of 3‐D cohesive fractures
Author(s) -
Kim J.,
Simone A.,
Duarte C. A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.5286
Subject(s) - initialization , nonlinear system , finite element method , robustness (evolution) , polygon mesh , mesh generation , computer science , stiffness , algorithm , adaptive mesh refinement , discontinuity (linguistics) , mathematics , computational science , geometry , structural engineering , mathematical analysis , engineering , physics , biochemistry , chemistry , quantum mechanics , gene , programming language
Summary A robust and efficient strategy is proposed to simulate mechanical problems involving cohesive fractures. This class of problems is characterized by a global structural behavior that is strongly affected by localized nonlinearities at relatively small‐sized critical regions. The proposed approach is based on the division of a simulation into a suitable number of sub‐simulations where adaptive mesh refinement is performed only once based on refinement window(s) around crack front process zone(s). The initialization of Newton‐Raphson nonlinear iterations at the start of each sub‐simulation is accomplished by solving a linear problem based on a secant stiffness, rather than a volume mapping of nonlinear solutions between meshes. The secant stiffness is evaluated using material state information stored/read on crack surface facets which are employed to explicitly represent the geometry of the discontinuity surface independently of the volume mesh within the generalized finite element method framework. Moreover, a simplified version of the algorithm is proposed for its straightforward implementation into existing commercial software. Data transfer between sub‐simulations is not required in the simplified strategy. The computational efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the proposed strategies are demonstrated by an application to cohesive fracture simulations in 3‐D. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.