Premium
Uncertainty quantification models for micro‐scale squeeze‐film damping
Author(s) -
Guo Xiaohui,
Li Jia,
Xiu Dongbin,
Alexeenko Alina
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.2952
Subject(s) - uncertainty quantification , parametric statistics , mechanics , nonlinear system , statistical physics , slip (aerodynamics) , work (physics) , polynomial chaos , damping ratio , polynomial , mathematics , physics , mathematical analysis , statistics , thermodynamics , monte carlo method , vibration , acoustics , quantum mechanics
Two squeeze‐film gas damping models are proposed to quantify uncertainties associated with the gap size and the ambient pressure. Modeling of gas damping has become a subject of increased interest in recent years due to its importance in micro‐electro‐mechanical systems (MEMS). In addition to the need for gas damping models for design of MEMS with movable micro‐structures, knowledge of parameter dependence in gas damping contributes to the understanding of device‐level reliability. In this work, two damping models quantifying the uncertainty in parameters are generated based on rarefied flow simulations. One is a generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) model, which is a general strategy for uncertainty quantification, and the other is a compact model developed specifically for this problem in an early work. Convergence and statistical analysis have been conducted to verify both models. By taking the gap size and ambient pressure as random fields with known probability distribution functions (PDF), the output PDF for the damping coefficient can be obtained. The first four central moments are used in comparisons of the resulting non‐parametric distributions. A good agreement has been found, within 1%, for the relative difference for damping coefficient mean values. In study of geometric uncertainty, it is found that the average damping coefficient can deviate up to 13% from the damping coefficient corresponding to the average gap size. The difference is significant at the nonlinear region where the flow is in slip or transitional rarefied regimes. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.