Premium
Higher‐order beam analysis of box beams connected at angled joints subject to out‐of‐plane bending and torsion
Author(s) -
Jang GangWon,
Kim Kyung Joo,
Kim Yoon Young
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.2314
Subject(s) - image warping , timoshenko beam theory , finite element method , torsion (gastropod) , beam (structure) , mathematics , displacement field , conjugate beam method , distortion (music) , structural engineering , bending stiffness , computer science , engineering , artificial intelligence , medicine , surgery , amplifier , computer network , bandwidth (computing)
Abstract The difficulty in the analysis of thin‐walled beams by a beam theory comes from slowly decaying end effects associated with warping and distortion. However, a beam theory without considering such effects yields inaccurate solutions especially near beam ends. Numerical analysis using a higher‐order beam theory capable of representing such effects is now available, but the analysis of a series of box beams connected by angled joints still remains an unsolved problem because of the lack of a matching condition at the joint. The objectives of this investigation are to develop a field‐variable‐matching technique at an angled joint through a higher‐order beam theory and to implement it in the finite element formulation. Thin‐walled box beams in consideration are assumed to be subject to out‐of‐plane bending and torsion. Thus, the minimization of three‐dimensional displacement mismatch is used to relate the field variables at a joint intersection. The minimization condition turns out to represent coupling effects of different deformation kinematics such as torsion, bending, distortion and warping. Point‐wise displacement matching is not possible with a higher‐order beam theory. The validity of the proposed technique was verified by a finite element analysis using two‐node higher‐order beam elements applied to some benchmark problems. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.