z-logo
Premium
Theory and finite element computation of cyclic martensitic phase transformation at finite strain
Author(s) -
Stein Erwin,
Sagar Gautam
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.2148
Subject(s) - finite element method , hyperelastic material , finite strain theory , mathematics , upper and lower bounds , mathematical analysis , stress (linguistics) , kinematics , elastic energy , physics , classical mechanics , thermodynamics , linguistics , philosophy
A generalized variational formulation, including quasi‐convexification of energy wells for arbitrarily many martensitic variants in case of mono‐crystals for linearized strains, was developed by Govindjee and Miehe ( Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2001; 191 (3–5):215–238) and computationally extended by Stein and Zwickert ( Comput. Mech. 2006; in press). This work is generalized here for finite strain kinematics with monotonous hyperelastic stress–strain functions in order to account for large transformation strains that can reach up to 15%. A major theoretical and numerical difficulty herein is the convexification of the finite deformation phase transformation (PT) problems for multiple phase variants, n ⩾2. A lower bound of the mixing energy is provided by the Reuss bound in case of linear kinematics and an arbitrary number of variants, shown by Govindjee et al. ( J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2003; 51 (4):I–XXVI). In case of finite strains, a generalized representation of free energy of mixing is introduced for a quasi‐Reuss bound, which in general holds for n ⩽2. Numerical validation of the used micro–macro material model is presented by comparing verified numerical results with the experimental data for Cu 82 Al 14 Ni 4 monocrystals for quasiplastic PT, provided by Xiangyang et al. ( J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2000; 48 :2163–2182). The zigzag‐type experimental stress–strain curve within PT at loading, called ‘yield tooth’, is approximated within the finite element analysis by a smoothly decreasing and then increasing axial stress which could not be achieved with linearized kinematics yielding a constant axial stress during PT. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom