Premium
Comparison of fully implicit and IMPES formulations for simulation of water injection in fractured and unfractured media
Author(s) -
Monteagudo J. E. P.,
Firoozabadi A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.1783
Subject(s) - jacobian matrix and determinant , discretization , linearization , computation , matrix (chemical analysis) , nonlinear system , newton's method , mathematics , fracture (geology) , iterative method , computer science , mathematical analysis , algorithm , engineering , geotechnical engineering , materials science , physics , quantum mechanics , composite material
In this work, we compare the fully implicit (FI) and implicit pressure‐explicit saturation (IMPES) formulations for the simulation of water injection in fractured media. The system of partial differential equations is discretized within the discrete‐fracture framework using a control‐volume method. A unique feature of the methodology is that there is no need for the computation of matrix–fracture transfer terms. The non‐linear system of equations resulting from the FI formulation is solved with state‐of‐the‐art Newton and tensor methods. Direct and Krylov iterative methods are employed to solve the system resulting from the Newton linearization. The performance of the FI and IMPES formulations is compared with numerical testing. Results show that the contrast between matrix and fracture properties affects the performance of both IMPES and FI formulations and that the tensor method outperforms all the Newton solvers for the near‐singular Jacobian matrix. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.