Premium
Eigenvalue convergence in the finite element method
Author(s) -
Bennighof J. K.,
Meirovitch L.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/nme.1620231112
Subject(s) - eigenvalues and eigenvectors , finite element method , mathematics , convergence (economics) , degree of a polynomial , interpolation (computer graphics) , limiting , hp fem , mixed finite element method , mathematical analysis , polynomial , finite element limit analysis , computer science , structural engineering , physics , engineering , animation , mechanical engineering , quantum mechanics , economics , economic growth , computer graphics (images)
In static force‐deflection applications of the finite element method, convergence rates for the p ‐version, in which the polynomial degree of element interpolation functions is increased while the mesh remains fixed, are superior to those for the h ‐version, in which the element degree remains fixed while the mesh is refined so that element size approaches zero. In structural dynamics applications, one does not seek to approximate a single solution, as in static applications, but seeks estimates for a number of the lower system eigenvalues. This paper identifies factors responsible for poorer accuracy in higher computed eigenvalues. In addition, it explains why the p ‐version of the finite element method can be expected to exhibit significantly better eigenvalue convergence than the h ‐version. Numerical examples demonstrate the superiority of the p ‐version over the h ‐version. They also show the effects of various mechanisms limiting eigenvalue convergence.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom