Premium
Bounds on the fault‐diameter of graphs
Author(s) -
Dankelmann Peter
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
networks
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.977
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1097-0037
pISSN - 0028-3045
DOI - 10.1002/net.21758
Subject(s) - combinatorics , mathematics , bounded function , upper and lower bounds , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , order (exchange) , graph , fault (geology) , discrete mathematics , computer science , telecommunications , mathematical analysis , finance , seismology , economics , geology
Let G be a ( k + 1 ) ‐connected or ( k + 1 ) ‐edge‐connected graph, where k ∈ ℕ . The k ‐fault‐diameter and k ‐edge‐fault‐diameter of G is the largest diameter of the subgraphs obtained from G by removing up to k vertices and edges, respectively. In this paper we give upper bounds on the k ‐fault‐diameter and k ‐edge‐fault‐diameter of graphs in terms of order. We show that the k ‐fault‐diameter of a ( k + 1 ) ‐connected graph G of order n is bounded from above by n − k + 1 , and by approximately4 k + 2 n if G is also triangle‐free. If G does not contain 4‐cycles then this bound can be improved further to approximately5 n( k − 1 ) 2. We further show that the k ‐edge‐fault‐diameter of a ( k + 1 ) ‐edge‐connected graph of order n is bounded by n – 1 if k = 1, by⌊2 n − 1 3⌋if k = 2, and by approximately3 k + 2 n if k ≥ 3 , and give improved bounds for triangle‐free graphs. Some of the latter bounds strengthen, in some sense, bounds by Erdös, Pach, Pollack, and Tuza (J Combin Theory B 47 (1989) 73–79) on the diameter. All bounds presented are sharp or at least close to being optimal. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 70(2), 132–140 2017
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom