Premium
Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis of the Parenteral Nutrition Process in a Mother–Child Hospital: The AMELIORE Study
Author(s) -
Boulé Marianne,
Lachapelle Sophie,
CollinLévesque Laurence,
Demers Émile,
Nguyen Christina,
FournierTondreau Marylou,
Thibault Maxime,
Lebel Denis,
Bussières JeanFrançois
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
nutrition in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1941-2452
pISSN - 0884-5336
DOI - 10.1002/ncp.10094
Subject(s) - failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis , medicine , failure mode and effects analysis , medical prescription , multidisciplinary approach , psychological intervention , process (computing) , criticality , parenteral nutrition , intestinal failure , medical emergency , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , reliability engineering , nursing , computer science , engineering , social science , physics , sociology , nuclear physics , operating system
Abstract Background The parenteral nutrition (PN) process is complex and involves multiple steps and substeps, especially in pediatrics and neonatology, given the particular needs of these patients. The objective of this study was to perform a critical analysis of the PN process at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte‐Justine to determine which potential pitfalls are related to this process and which should be prioritized when implementing corrective measures. Methods This is a Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) study. A multidisciplinary team assessed each step of the PN process and identified associated failure modes. Adapted rating scales were used to determine severity, frequency, and detectability of the failure modes. Ratings were established through multidisplinary consensus, and a criticality index (CI) was calculated for each failure mode. Results A total of 265 failure modes were identified in the 5 major steps of the PN process. The failure mode with the highest CI was the inscription of an inaccurate weight at prescription, with a CI of 800. The step with the highest cumulative CIs was administration to patients, with a CI sum of 7691. Various recommendations aimed at minimizing the risks associated with the PN process were made following this FMECA. Additional interventions are expected to emanate from this project because data will be presented throughout the departments involved. Conclusion This study is a successful example for other hospitals interested in carrying out the same kind of healthcare improvement initiative.