Premium
Docetaxel chemotherapy response in PC3 prostate cancer mouse model detected by rotating frame relaxations and water diffusion
Author(s) -
Laakso Hanne,
YläHerttuala Elias,
Sierra Alejandra,
Jambor Ivan,
Poutanen Matti,
Liljenbäck Heidi,
Virtanen Helena,
Merisaari Harri,
Aronen Hannu,
Minn Heikki,
Roivainen Anne,
Liimatainen Timo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.4483
Subject(s) - docetaxel , prostate cancer , medicine , effective diffusion coefficient , prostate , nuclear medicine , cancer , chemotherapy , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear magnetic resonance , urology , radiology , physics
MRI is a common method of prostate cancer diagnosis. Several MRI‐derived markers, including the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) based on diffusion‐weighted imaging, have been shown to provide values for prostate cancer detection and characterization. The hypothesis of the study was that docetaxel chemotherapy response could be picked up earlier with rotating frame relaxation times T RAFF2 and T RAFF4 than with the continuous wave T 1ρ , adiabatic T 1ρ , adiabatic T 2ρ , T 1 , T 2 or water ADC. Human PC3 prostate cancer cells expressing a red fluorescent protein were implanted in 21 male mice. Docetaxel chemotherapy was given once a week starting 1 week after cell implantation for 10 randomly selected mice, while the rest served as a control group ( n = 11). The MRI consisted of relaxation along a fictitious field (RAFF) in the second (RAFF2) and fourth (RAFF4) rotating frames, T 1 and T 2 , continuous wave T 1ρ , adiabatic T 1ρ and adiabatic T 2ρ relaxation time measurements and water ADC. MRI was conducted at 7 T, once a week up to 4 weeks from cell implantation. The tumor volume was monitored using T 2 ‐weighted MRI and optical imaging. The histology was evaluated after the last imaging time point. Significantly reduced RAFF n , T 1ρ, T 2ρ and conventional relaxation times 4 weeks after tumor implantation were observed in the treated tumors compared with the controls. The clearest short‐ and long‐term responses were obtained with T 1 , while no clear improvement in response to treatment was detected with novel methods compared with conventional methods or with RAFF n compared with all others. The tumor volume decreased after a two‐week time point for the treated group and increased significantly in the control group, which was supported by increasing red fluorescent light emission in the control tumors. Decreased relaxation times were associated with successful chemotherapy outcomes. The results indicate altered relaxation mechanisms compared with higher dose chemotherapies previously published.