Premium
Cardiac cine magnetic resonance fingerprinting for combined ejection fraction, T 1 and T 2 quantification
Author(s) -
Hamilton Jesse I.,
Jiang Yun,
Eck Brendan,
Griswold Mark,
Seiberlich Nicole
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.4323
Subject(s) - ejection fraction , imaging phantom , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , cardiac cycle , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , artificial intelligence , medicine , computer science , cardiology , heart failure , radiology
This study introduces a technique called cine magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cine‐MRF) for simultaneous T 1 , T 2 and ejection fraction (EF) quantification. Data acquired with a free‐running MRF sequence are retrospectively sorted into different cardiac phases using an external electrocardiogram (ECG) signal. A low‐rank reconstruction with a finite difference sparsity constraint along the cardiac motion dimension yields images resolved by cardiac phase. To improve SNR and precision in the parameter maps, these images are nonrigidly registered to the same phase and matched to a dictionary to generate T 1 and T 2 maps. Cine images for computing left ventricular volumes and EF are also derived from the same data. Cine‐MRF was tested in simulations using a numerical relaxation phantom. Phantom and in vivo scans of 19 subjects were performed at 3 T during a 10.9 seconds breath‐hold with an in‐plane resolution of 1.6 x 1.6 mm 2 and 24 cardiac phases. Left ventricular EF values obtained with cine‐MRF agreed with the conventional cine images (mean bias −1.0%). Average myocardial T 1 times in diastole/systole were 1398/1391 ms with cine‐MRF, 1394/1378 ms with ECG‐triggered cardiac MRF (cMRF) and 1234/1212 ms with MOLLI; and T 2 values were 30.7/30.3 ms with cine‐MRF, 32.6/32.9 ms with ECG‐triggered cMRF and 37.6/41.0 ms with T 2 ‐prepared FLASH. Cine‐MRF and ECG‐triggered cMRF relaxation times were in good agreement. Cine‐MRF T 1 values were significantly longer than MOLLI, and cine‐MRF T 2 values were significantly shorter than T 2 ‐prepared FLASH. In summary, cine‐MRF can potentially streamline cardiac MRI exams by combining left ventricle functional assessment and T 1 ‐T 2 mapping into one time‐efficient acquisition.