Premium
Magnetic resonance elastography of the lungs: A repeatability and reproducibility study
Author(s) -
Fakhouri Faisal,
Dong Huiming,
Kolipaka Arunark
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.4102
Subject(s) - repeatability , reproducibility , magnetic resonance elastography , intraclass correlation , stiffness , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , lung volumes , concordance , elastography , lung , materials science , medicine , ultrasound , chemistry , radiology , chromatography , composite material
Lung diseases are one of the leading causes of death worldwide, from which four million people die annually. Lung diseases are associated with changes in the mechanical properties of the lungs. Several studies have shown the feasibility of using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to quantify the lungs' shear stiffness. The aim of this study is to investigate the reproducibility and repeatability of lung MRE, and its shear stiffness measurements, obtained using a modified spin echo‐echo planar imaging (SE‐EPI) MRE sequence. In this study, 21 healthy volunteers were scanned twice by repositioning the volunteers to image right lung both at residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC) to assess the reproducibility of lung shear stiffness measurements. Additionally, 19 out of the 21 volunteers were scanned immediately without moving the volunteers to test the repeatability of the modified SE‐EPI MRE sequence. A paired t ‐test was performed to determine the significant difference between stiffness measurements obtained at RV and TLC. Concordance correlation and Bland–Altman's analysis were performed to determine the reproducibility and repeatability of the SE‐EPI MRE‐derived shear stiffness measurements. The SE‐EPI MRE sequence is highly repeatable with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.95 at RV and 0.96 at TLC. Similarly, the stiffness measurements obtained across all volunteers were highly reproducible with a CCC of 0.95 at RV and 0.92 at TLC. The mean shear stiffness of the lung at RV was 0.93 ± 0.22 kPa and at TLC was 1.41 ± 0.41 kPa. TLC showed a significantly higher mean shear stiffness ( P = 0.0004) compared with RV. Lung MRE stiffness measurements obtained using the SE‐EPI sequence were reproducible and repeatable, both at RV and TLC. Lung shear stiffness changes across respiratory cycle with significantly higher stiffness at TLC than RV.