Premium
The impact of white matter fiber orientation in single‐acquisition quantitative susceptibility mapping
Author(s) -
Lancione Marta,
Tosetti Michela,
Donatelli Graziella,
Cosottini Mirco,
Costagli Mauro
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3798
Subject(s) - quantitative susceptibility mapping , voxel , anisotropy , nuclear magnetic resonance , fractional anisotropy , white matter , orientation (vector space) , magnetic susceptibility , diffusion mri , magnetic resonance imaging , materials science , chemistry , physics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , optics , computer science , medicine , crystallography , geometry , radiology
The aim of this work was to assess the impact of tissue structural orientation on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reliability, and to provide a criterion to identify voxels in which measures of magnetic susceptibility (χ) are most affected by spatial orientation effects. Four healthy volunteers underwent 7‐T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multi‐echo, gradient‐echo sequences were used to obtain quantitative maps of frequency shift (FS) and χ. Information from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was used to investigate the relationship between tissue orientation and FS measures and QSM. After sorting voxels on the basis of their fractional anisotropy (FA), the variations in FS and χ values over tissue orientation were measured. Using a K ‐means clustering algorithm, voxels were separated into two groups depending on the variability of measures within each FA interval. The consistency of FS and QSM values, observed at low FA, was disrupted for FA > 0.6. The standard deviation of χ measured at high FA (0.0103 ppm) was nearly five times that at low FA (0.0022 ppm). This result was consistent through data across different head positions and for different brain regions considered separately, which confirmed that such behavior does not depend on structures with different bulk susceptibility oriented along particular angles. The reliability of single‐orientation QSM anticorrelates with local FA. QSM provides replicable values with little variability in brain regions with FA < 0.6, but QSM should be interpreted cautiously in major and coherent fiber bundles, which are strongly affected by structural anisotropy and magnetic susceptibility anisotropy.