z-logo
Premium
T 2 mapping with magnetization‐prepared 3D TSE based on a modified BIR‐4  T 2 preparation
Author(s) -
Weidlich Dominik,
Schlaeger Sarah,
Kooijman Hendrik,
Börnert Peter,
Kirschke Jan S.,
Rummeny Ernst J.,
Haase Axel,
Karampinos Dimitrios C.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3773
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , standard deviation , robustness (evolution) , saturation (graph theory) , repeatability , physics , computational physics , algorithm , mathematics , statistics , combinatorics , optics , chemistry , biochemistry , gene
The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of the modified BIR‐4 T 2 preparation for T 2 mapping and propose a method to remove T 2 quantification errors in the presence of large B 1 and B 0 offsets. The theoretical investigation of the magnetization evolution during the T 2 preparation in the presence of B 1 and B 0 offsets showed deviations from a mono‐exponential T 2 decay (two parameter fit). A three parameter fit was used to improve T 2 accuracy. Furthermore, a two parameter fit with an additional saturation preparation scan was proposed to improve T 2 accuracy and precision. These three fitting methods were compared based on simulations, phantom measurements and an in vivo healthy volunteer study of the neck musculature using a 3D TSE readout. The results based upon the pure two parameter fit overestimated T 2 in regions with high B 0 offsets (up to 40% in phantoms). The three parameter fit T 2 values were robust to B 0 offsets but with higher standard deviation (up to 40% in simulations). The two parameter fit with the saturation preparation yielded high robustness towards B 0 offsets with a noise performance comparable to that of the two parameter fit. In the volunteer study the T 2 values obtained by the pure two parameter fit showed a dependence on the field inhomogeneities, whereas the T 2 values from the proposed fitting approach were shown to be insensitive to B 0 offsets. The proposed method enabled accurate and precise T 2 mapping in the presence of large B 1 and B 0 offsets.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom