Premium
Quantification of γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) in 1 H MRS volumes composed heterogeneously of grey and white matter
Author(s) -
Mikkelsen Mark,
Singh Krish D.,
Brealy Jennifer A.,
Linden David E.J.,
Evans C. John
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3622
Subject(s) - partial volume , white matter , grey matter , chemistry , volume (thermodynamics) , nuclear magnetic resonance , aminobutyric acid , mathematics , analytical chemistry (journal) , physics , nuclear medicine , thermodynamics , chromatography , magnetic resonance imaging , biochemistry , medicine , receptor , radiology
The quantification of γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration using localised MRS suffers from partial volume effects related to differences in the intrinsic concentration of GABA in grey (GM) and white (WM) matter. These differences can be represented as a ratio between intrinsic GABA in GM and WM: r M . Individual differences in GM tissue volume can therefore potentially drive apparent concentration differences. Here, a quantification method that corrects for these effects is formulated and empirically validated. Quantification using tissue water as an internal concentration reference has been described previously. Partial volume effects attributed to r M can be accounted for by incorporating into this established method an additional multiplicative correction factor based on measured or literature values of r M weighted by the proportion of GM and WM within tissue‐segmented MRS volumes. Simulations were performed to test the sensitivity of this correction using different assumptions of r M taken from previous studies. The tissue correction method was then validated by applying it to an independent dataset of in vivo GABA measurements using an empirically measured value of r M . It was shown that incorrect assumptions of r M can lead to overcorrection and inflation of GABA concentration measurements quantified in volumes composed predominantly of WM. For the independent dataset, GABA concentration was linearly related to GM tissue volume when only the water signal was corrected for partial volume effects. Performing a full correction that additionally accounts for partial volume effects ascribed to r M successfully removed this dependence. With an appropriate assumption of the ratio of intrinsic GABA concentration in GM and WM, GABA measurements can be corrected for partial volume effects, potentially leading to a reduction in between‐participant variance, increased power in statistical tests and better discriminability of true effects.