z-logo
Premium
Influence of fat–water separation and spatial resolution on automated volumetric MRI measurements of fibroglandular breast tissue
Author(s) -
Wengert Georg J.,
PinkerDomenig Katja,
Helbich Thomas H.,
Vogl WolfDieter,
Clauser Paola,
Bickel Hubert,
Marino MariaAdele,
Magometschnigg Heinrich F.,
Baltzer Pascal A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3516
Subject(s) - flip angle , voxel , scanner , nuclear magnetic resonance , anisotropy , nuclear medicine , image resolution , materials science , isotropy , physics , magnetic resonance imaging , optics , medicine , radiology
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of fat–water separation and spatial resolution in MRI on the results of automated quantitative measurements of fibroglandular breast tissue (FGT). Ten healthy volunteers (age range, 28–71 years; mean, 39.9 years) were included in this Institutional Review Board‐approved prospective study. All measurements were performed on a 1.5‐T scanner (Siemens, AvantoFit) using an 18‐channel breast coil. The protocols included isotropic (Di) [TR/TE 1 /TE 2  = 6.00 ms/2.45 ms/2.67 ms; flip angle, 6.0°; 256 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; 1 mm isotropic; field of view, 360°; acquisition time (TA) = 3 min 38 s] and anisotropic (Da) (TR/TE 1 /TE 2  = 10.00 ms/2.39 ms/4.77 ms; flip angle, 24.9°; 80 slices; matrix 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm 3 ; field of view, 360°; TA = 1 min 25 s) T 1 three‐dimensional (3D) fast low‐angle shot (FLASH) Dixon sequences, and a T 1 3D FLASH sequence with the same resolution ( T 1 ) without (TR/TE = 11.00 ms/4.76 ms; flip angle, 25.0°; 80 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm 3 ; field of view, 360°; TA = 50 s) and with (TR/TE = 29.00 ms/4.76 ms; flip angle, 25.0°; 80 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm 3 ; field of view, 360°; TA = 2 min 35 s) fat saturation. Repeating volunteer measurements after 20 min and repositioning were used to assess reproducibility. An automated and quantitative volumetric breast density measurement system was used for FGT calculation. FGT with Di, Da and T 1 measured 4.6–63.0% (mean, 30.6%), 3.2–65.3% (mean, 32.5%) and 1.7–66.5% (mean, 33.7%), respectively. The highest correlation between different MRI sequences was found with the Di and Da sequences ( R 2  = 0.976). Coefficients of variation (CVs) for FGT calculation were higher in T 1 (CV = 21.5%) compared with Dixon (Di, CV = 5.1%; Da, CV = 4.2%) sequences. Dixon‐type sequences worked well for FGT measurements, even at lower resolution, whereas the conventional T 1 ‐weighted sequence was more sensitive to decreasing resolution. The Dixon fat–water separation technique showed superior repeatability of FGT measurements compared with conventional sequences. A standard dynamic protocol using Dixon fat–water separation is best suited for combined diagnostic purposes and prognostic measurements of FGT. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here