Premium
Dipole antennas for ultrahigh‐field body imaging: a comparison with loop coils
Author(s) -
Raaijmakers A. J. E.,
Luijten P. R.,
Berg C. A. T.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3356
Subject(s) - dipole , dipole antenna , physics , electromagnetic coil , specific absorption rate , decoupling (probability) , loop (graph theory) , ultra high frequency , computational physics , nuclear magnetic resonance , loop antenna , acoustics , optics , antenna (radio) , computer science , telecommunications , engineering , mathematics , antenna factor , quantum mechanics , control engineering , combinatorics
Although the potential of dipole antennas for ultrahigh‐field (UHF) MRI is largely recognized, they are still relatively unknown to the larger part of the MRI community. This article intends to provide electromagnetic insight into the general operating principles of dipole antennas by numerical simulations. The major part focuses on a comparison study of dipole antennas and loop coils at frequencies of 128, 298 and 400 MHz. This study shows that dipole antennas are only efficient radiofrequency (RF) coils in the presence of a dielectric and/or conducting load. In addition, the conservative electric fields (E‐fields) at the ends of a dipole are negligible in comparison with the induced E‐fields in the center. Like loop coils, long dipole antennas perform better than short dipoles for deeply located imaging targets and vice versa. When the optimal element is chosen for each depth, loop coils have higher B 1 + efficiency for shallow depths, whereas dipole antennas have higher B 1 + efficiency for large depths. The cross‐over point depth decreases with increasing frequency: 11.6, 6.2 and 5.0 cm for 128, 298 and 400 MHz, respectively. For single elements, loop coils demonstrate a better B 1 + /√SAR max ratio for any target depth and any frequency. However, one example study shows that, in an array setup with loop coil overlap for decoupling, this relationship is not straightforward. The overlapping loop coils may generate increased specific absorption rate (SAR) levels under the overlapping parts of the loops, depending on the drive phase settings. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.