Premium
MR elastography of prostate cancer: quantitative comparison with histopathology and repeatability of methods
Author(s) -
Sahebjavaher Ramin S.,
Nir Guy,
Honarvar Mohammad,
Gag Louis O.,
Ischia Joseph,
Jones Edward C.,
Chang Silvia D.,
Fazli Ladan,
Goldenberg S. Larry,
Rohling Robert,
Kozlowski Piotr,
Sinkus Ralph,
Salcudean Septimiu E.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.3218
Subject(s) - repeatability , imaging phantom , elastography , prostate , nuclear medicine , prostate cancer , prostatectomy , medicine , histopathology , intraclass correlation , volunteer , magnetic resonance imaging , voxel , radiology , cancer , ultrasound , pathology , mathematics , biology , clinical psychology , psychometrics , statistics , agronomy
The purpose of this work was to assess trans‐perineal prostate magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for (1) repeatability in phantoms/volunteers and (2) diagnostic power as correlated with histopathology in prostate cancer patients. The three‐dimensional (3D) displacement field was obtained using a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence using a custom‐made transducer. The repeatability of the method was assessed based on three repeat studies and by changing the driving frequency by 3% in studies on a phantom and six healthy volunteers. Subsequently, 11 patients were examined with MRE prior to radical prostatectomy. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated using a windowed voxel‐to‐voxel approach by comparing the 2D registered slides, masked with the Gleason score. For the repeatability study, the average intraclass correlation coefficient for elasticity images was 99% for repeat phantom studies, 98% for ±6 Hz phantom studies, 95% for volunteer repeat studies with 2 min acquisition time, 82% for ±2 Hz volunteer studies with 2 min acquisition time and 73% for repeat volunteer studies with 8 min acquisition time. For the patient study, the average elasticity was 8.2 ± 1.7 kPa in the prostate capsule, 7.5 ± 1.9 kPa in the peripheral zone (PZ), 9.7 ± 3.0 kPa in the central gland (CG) and 9.0 ± 3.4 kPa in the transition zone. In the patient study, cancerous tissue with Gleason score at least 3 + 3 was significantly ( p < 0.05) different from normal tissue in 10 out of 11 cases with tumors in the PZ, and 6 out of 9 cases with tumors in the CG. However, the overall case‐averaged area under the curve was 0.72 in the PZ and 0.67 in the CG. Cancerous tissue was not always stiffer than normal tissue. The inversion algorithm was sensitive to (i) vibration amplitude and displacement nodes and (ii) misalignment of the 3D wave field due to subject movement. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.