Premium
Experimental comparison of four FAIR arterial spin labeling techniques for quantification of mouse cerebral blood flow at 4.7 T
Author(s) -
Kober Frank,
Duhamel Guillaume,
Cozzone Patrick J.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/nbm.1253
Subject(s) - cerebral blood flow , arterial spin labeling , blood flow , nuclear magnetic resonance , biomedical engineering , nuclear medicine , materials science , medicine , chemistry , mathematics , cardiology , physics
Pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an attractive and robust method for quantification of rodent cerebral blood flow (CBF) in particular, although there is a need for sensitivity optimization. Look–Locker flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) echo planar imaging (EPI) (LLFAIREPI) was expected to be a likely candidate for assessing sensitivity, although it has not yet been applied to rodents. In this study, the performance of two FAIR techniques and two Look–Locker FAIR techniques were compared in mouse brain at 4.7 T. FAIR‐EPI (single inversion time, FAIREPI‐1TI), FAIR‐EPI (eight inversion times, FAIREPI‐8TI), LLFAIREPI and Look–Locker FAIR gradient echo (LLFAIRGE) sequences were implemented with equal spatial resolution and equal FAIR preparation modules. Measurements were carried out sequentially on the brain in 10 healthy mice, and quantitative CBF maps were obtained after different acquisition times up to 23 min. All methods gave similar group variability in CBF. Especially at shorter acquisition times, LLFAIREPI gave lower relative variations in CBF within selected brain regions than the other techniques at the same acquisition time. The Look–Locker techniques, however, overestimated CBF compared with classical FAIR‐EPI, which was attributed to bulk flow in arterioles and T 2 effects. The image quality with LLFAIREPI was less reproducible within the group. Both FAIREPI‐1TI and LLFAIREPI appear to be good candidates for serial rapid measurement of CBF, but LLFAIREPI has the additional advantage that apparent T 1 can be measured simultaneously with CBF. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.