Premium
Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Report of the 2015 Consensus Conference
Author(s) -
Biardeau X.,
Aharony S.,
Campeau L.,
Corcos J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/nau.22989
Subject(s) - medicine , artificial urinary sphincter , urinary incontinence , presentation (obstetrics) , brainstorming , medical education , family medicine , urology , surgery , artificial intelligence , computer science
Purpose The AMS800™ device, by far the most frequently implanted artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) worldwide, is considered to be the “gold‐standard” when male incontinence surgical treatment is contemplated. Despite 40 years of experience, it is still a specialized procedure with a number of challenges. Here, we present the recommendations issued from the AUS Consensus Group, regarding indications, management, and follow‐up AMS800™ implantation or revision. Materials and Methods Under ICS auspices, an expert panel met on July 10, 2015 in Chicago, IL, USA in an attempt to reach a consensus on diverse issues related to the AMS800™ device. Participants were selected by the two co‐chairs on the basis of their practice in a University hospital and their experience: number of implanted AUSs according to AMS (American Medical System Holdings Inc., Minnetonka, MN) records and/or major published articles. Topics listed were the result of a pre‐meeting email brainstorming by all participants. The co‐chairs distributed topics randomly to all participants, who then had to propose a statement on each topic for approval by the conference after a short evidence‐based presentation, when possible. Results A total of 25 urologists were invited to participate, 19 able to attend the conference. The present recommendations, based on the most recent and relevant data available in literature as well as expert opinions, successively address multiple specific and problematic issues associated with the AMS800™ trough a eight‐chapter structure: pre‐operative assessment, pre operative challenges, implantation technique, post‐operative care, trouble‐shooting, outcomes, special populations, and the future of AUSs. Conclusion These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists to carefully select patients and apply the most adapted management to implantation, follow‐up and trouble‐shooting of the AMS800™. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:S8–S24, 2016 . © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.